Share This

Friday, 7 August 2026

When ‘be careful’ is not enough

 

PETALING JAYA: “Be careful.” These are caring words often told to older persons to watch their step.

But fall prevention requires more than simply telling the ­senior citizen to “be careful”, said Prof Dr Tan Maw Pin, a professor in geriatric medicine at Universiti Malaya Medical Centre.

But fall prevention requires more than simply telling the ­senior citizen to “be

Malaysia, she said, has yet to implement a coordinated natio­nal falls prevention strategy despite the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2025 report stating that about 15% of Malaysians aged 60 and above fall at least once a year.

“Getting the statistics is important but it must lead to policy, investment, implementation and evaluation,” she said.

According to the World Health Organization, falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide, with adults older than 60 suffering the highest number of fatal falls.

ASLO READ: Easing big fears of small falls with home modifications

Dr Tan said a fall should never be dismissed as a normal part of ageing.

ASLO READ: Easing big fears of small falls with home modifications

Dr Tan said a fall should never be dismissed as a normal part of ageing.

“The likelihood of falling – and of sustaining a serious injury – rises with age, frailty, muscle weakness, osteoporosis and chronic illness.

“A fall may cause a hip fracture, head injury, bleeding or other fractures,” she added.

Dr Tan cautioned that its consequences frequently extend beyond the immediate injury.

“An older person may become afraid of falling again, reduce their activity, lose muscle strength and become increasingly depen­dent.

“Some never regain their previous mobility or indepen­dence,” she explained.

A first fall should be regarded as a warning sign warranting assessment, particularly if it is unexplained or results in injury, Dr Tan noted.

'CLICK TO ENLARGE'
'CLICK TO ENLARGE'

“Anyone who develops loss of consciousness, confusion, severe headache, vomiting, weakness of an arm or leg, inability to stand, severe pain or a suspected fracture after a fall should receive urgent medical attention.

“People taking blood-thinning medication should also be assessed promptly following a head injury, even if they initially appear well,” she added.

Dr Tan also said medication such as sedatives, some antidepressants and certain blood-pressure medicines might cause drowsiness or a sudden drop in blood pressure.

“Eyesight, hearing, foot problems and footwear should also be assessed.”

Dehydration and medication side effects might also precipitate a fall, she said.

“Some falls result from heart rhythm abnormalities or fainting and should not automatically be blamed on ageing or clumsiness,” Dr Tan added.

ASLO READ: Never too late for stronger muscles and safer steps

“Mental and neurological factors are equally relevant. Dementia may affect judgement, attention and awareness of ­hazards.”

She said older folk should exercise regularly to improve muscle strength and balance, adding that this could include supervised strength training, balance exerci­ses or tai chi.

“At home, carers can improve lighting, remove loose rugs and clutter, secure electrical cables, install grab rails in bathrooms, provide non-slip flooring and ensure frequently needed items are within easy reach,” Dr Tan advised.

“Walking aids must be correctly fitted and used consistently. Older people should not feel embarrassed about using a walking stick or frame.”

While Malaysia has made progress in public spaces, Dr Tan said it is not yet consistently age-­friendly.

“Newer facilities may provide ramps, lifts and accessible toilets, but the routes leading to them may still contain broken or uneven pavements, poorly placed drains, slippery surfaces, inadequate lighting or missing handrails,” she said.

Association for Residential Aged Care Operators of Malaysia president Delren Terrence Douglas said many towns and ­cities are still not designed with the needs of senior citizens in mind, making everyday activities such as walking, shopping or visi­ting public parks unnecessarily difficult.

He said in some malls and parks, elderly people often have to keep walking despite feeling tired because there are few places to sit and rest.

“A shortage of benches, handrails and accessible ramps leaves many seniors struggling to complete even short journeys,” he added.

Saturday, 1 August 2026

AI ecosystem to get new legal framework, a pro­posed solu­tion for global AI gov­ernance


 

Governance Bill will not apply to personal use

PETALING JAYA: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, the AI lifecycle, as well as AI developers and deployers, are set to be regulated under the proposed Artificial Intelligence Governance Bill.

However, the Bill will not apply to the personal use of AI or on matters of national security.

Intended to serve as a national legal framework for the safe, responsible and innovation-enabling use of AI, the law will apply to systems placed on the Malaysian market or put into service in Malaysia.

ALSO READ: Evolving AI could outpace regulation, warn experts

It will also apply to AI systems designed, developed or used here, as well as those used by deployers set up in Malaysia, regardless of where the systems are physically hosted.

The proposed AI Governance Act is guided by five key principles: protecting human dignity and rights, transparency and explainability, accountability, safety and security, and responsible data governance.

Together, these principles provide the foundation for the responsible development, deployment and use of AI systems, while promoting trustworthy AI, innovation and public confidence.

CLICK TO ENLARGE
CLICK TO ENLARGE

According to the public consultation document released by the National AI Office (NAIO), the Bill will adopt a principle-based approach by setting out national AI Governance Principles to guide the responsible development, deployment and use of AI, with implementation supported through standards, guidelines and other instruments.

It also adopts a risk-based approach, with regulatory obligations proportionate to an AI system's level of risk, categorised into three levels: unacceptable, high and low.

This means that higher-risk systems will face stricter governance requirements while lower-risk applications will be subject to lighter obligations.

The risk framework is anchored on “harm”, which includes death, bodily injury, unlawful deprivation of fundamental liberty anchored to the Federal Constitution, and the contravention of any written law.

The Bill also categorise AI incidents to include failures, weaknesses, misuse, unexpected effects and near misses.

It will also require incidents to be reported, including the nature of the incident, its foreseeable harm, the containment measures taken, the root cause (where applicable), and the remediation actions implemented.

The Bill also proposes a central AI authority as the principal national body for AI governance, whose role will be to oversee and operate the national “baseline” principles and standards to strengthen the overall AI ecosystem by addressing gaps in capacity across sectors.

The authority will oversee AI safety by maintaining a risk framework, supervising assessments, supporting testing, developing incident reporting mechanisms and engaging in international technical cooperation.

It will also be responsible for investigations and enforcement, including technical fact-finding when AI incidents occur, determining what happened, identifying the systems and actors involved, as well as producing findings to support corrective actions.

In addition, it will carry out capacity-building functions for the public sector by developing guidance, templates, training and practical support for public authorities, regulators, AI sandbox operators or overseers, and regulated organisations to help them comply with the framework.

The authority may also appoint "Sectoral Leads", who will be delegated specific powers under the Bill to support the implementation of the framework, where they have the legal authority, technical expertise and governance capacity.

The proposed amendments in the document are not final and remain subject to further review and amendment.

Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo said in June that the government will adopt a two-pronged approach by using existing laws to prosecute those who misuse content, while also drafting the AI Governance Bill to further strengthen prevention and accountability throughout the technology’s lifecycle.

He said the move is aimed at ensuring that risks posed by high-capability technologies such as deepfakes, synthetic content and identity manipulation can be addressed at an early stage.

Ultimately, according to the public consultation document, the Bill aims to set up a central oversight framework that works alongside existing sectoral regulators to enable coordinated governance while addressing industry-specific risks and operational needs.

“This will allow public bodies, including existing regulators, to collaborate within a common governance framework, while retaining the flexibility to address sector-specific risks and operational needs,” it said.

The NAIO will be launched tomorrow.

Related stories:
20 Jul 2026The speech focused on China's governance philosophy of prioritising AI risk prevention and control while advancing secure, controllable, and ...Read more

Wednesday, 15 July 2026

Human judgment still matters in real estate

 

AI speeds and eases workload but not infallible

Contributed by Sulaiman Saheh

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the way professionals across various industries access information, analyse data and make decisions. In Malaysia, the government is entering a new phase of its AI agenda by shifting its focus from building digital infrastructure to accelerating AI adoption across businesses, public services and everyday professional practice. This national push is aimed at strengthening productivity, enhancing economic competitiveness and increasing the digital economy's contribution to gross domestic product (GDP). 

With the National AI Office set to be institutionalised as the central body coordinating AI strategy and governance in July 2026, AI is expected to become increasingly embedded across industries, including real estate. From property valuation and investment analysis to customer engagement and management of buildings, AI is offering new levels of speed, efficiency and analytical capability. While these technological advancements present significant opportunities, it is also important to appreciate the intrinsic workings of AI-generated solutions and the different contexts where it flourishes and where caution is due, especially with the early stages of AI adoption in uncharted territories. This is where one has to closely examine the continuing role of human expertise, professional judgment and critical thinking, particularly when it comes to deriving decisions for implementation in the reality of real estate investments and developments.

Why the excitement?

One of the reasons AI has generated so much excitement is its ability to process vast amounts of information in a fraction of the time required by humans. The real estate sector produces enormous volumes of data every day. Transaction records, rental rates, occupancy levels, demographic trends, economic indicators and development pipelines all contribute to a complex and constantly evolving market environment. AI systems can rapidly analyse these datasets, identify patterns and generate insights that would otherwise require considerable time and effort. For real estate professionals, this translates into greater efficiency, faster decision-making and improved productivity.

AI can also help reduce human errors in repetitive administrative tasks. Data entry, report generation, document review and customer enquiries can be streamlined through AI-powered tools. In a market where speed often matters, such efficiency gains can enhance service quality and allow practitioners to focus on higher-value activities. Property agencies can use AI-driven chatbots to respond to customer enquiries around the clock while researchers and analysts can leverage AI to identify emerging market trends and produce preliminary assessments more quickly than before. 

AI's greatest weakness 

Despite its impressive capabilities, AI is far from infallible. One of its greatest weaknesses lies in its dependence on data quality, programming transparency and user instructions or prompters. An AI system can only produce results based on the information it is given. If the data is incomplete, outdated, inaccurate or biased, the resulting analysis may also be flawed. This is particularly relevant in the real estate industry where data quality varies significantly across locations and market segments. In Malaysia, while transparency has improved over the years, certain market information remains fragmented or unavailable. Not all property transactions, buyer motivations or local market dynamics can be fully captured in databases. As a result, AI-generated conclusions may not always reflect the realities on the ground.

Furthermore, real estate is not solely a numbers-driven industry. Property decisions are influenced by factors that are often difficult to quantify. Human emotions, cultural preferences, community perceptions, lifestyle considerations and personal circumstances frequently shape purchasing decisions. A neighbourhood's reputation, the quality of nearby schools, accessibility to places of worship, future infrastructure developments and local community characteristics may significantly affect property values and buyer behaviour. While AI can identify statistical correlations, it may struggle to understand the nuances that experienced practitioners recognise through years of market exposure and local knowledge.

Challenges in diversity

This limitation is particularly relevant in Malaysia's diverse property landscape. Market behaviour in central Kuala Lumpur may differ substantially from Johor Bahru, Chemor or other cities and towns across the nation. Even within the same city, two seemingly similar developments may perform differently due to factors that are not immediately visible in historical datasets. Local market sentiment, developer reputation, community demographics and buyer confidence often play a larger role than many analytical models can adequately capture. Though there had been increased efforts for data gathering and quantification of sociological parameters, human professionals are often needed to interpret these subtleties and place data within its proper context.

Another concern that deserves attention is the growing tendency to place excessive trust in AI-generated outputs. Modern AI systems are capable of producing reports, analyses and recommendations that appear highly convincing. However, confidence should not be mistaken for accuracy. AI can generate information that sounds plausible but is factually inaccurate, incomplete or unsupported by reliable evidence. In recent years, this phenomenon has become widely recognised as one of the major limitations of generative AI technologies. If users fail to verify the information provided, there is a risk that inaccurate assumptions may be incorporated into important business decisions.

Perhaps the more subtle and potentially dangerous consequence of heavy AI reliance is its impact on human critical thinking. Professional competence is built not only on knowledge but also on the ability to question, evaluate and challenge information. In the practice of real estate professional advisory services, practitioners are expected to assess the reliability of data, identify anomalies and consider alternative interpretations before arriving at conclusions. When AI becomes the primary source of analysis, there is a risk that practitioners may gradually become less inclined to exercise independent judgments.

Over time, excessive dependence on AI may encourage a culture of passive acceptance rather than active inquiry. Instead of asking whether the data is complete, whether assumptions are reasonable or whether alternative explanations exist, individuals may simply accept AI-generated outputs at face value. This phenomenon can lead to what may be described as automation bias or even an epistemic complacency where users consciously or unconsciously choose not to scrutinise information because doing so requires additional effort. In such situations, errors may go undetected not because the technology failed but because humans failed to critically evaluate the technology's conclusions.

The human touch

The human element remains one of the most valuable aspects of professional real estate practice. Property transactions are among the most significant financial decisions many individuals will make during their lifetime. Buyers, sellers, investors and occupiers often seek more than just information; they seek reassurance, guidance and professional judgment. Trust is built through relationships, communication and credibility. These qualities cannot be replicated by algorithms alone.

A professional – be it in real estate or any other industry - does more than analyse data. They interpret market conditions, assess risks, consider broader economic implications and provide recommendations that account for unique circumstances. Experience enables professionals to recognise emerging patterns before they become visible in historical datasets. Judgment allows them to balance quantitative analysis with qualitative considerations. Ethics guide them in acting responsibly when data alone may not provide clear answers. These are inherently human capabilities that remain essential and relevant while being complemented by the technological advancements seen in AI and other technologies.

There is little doubt that AI will continue to evolve and become more sophisticated in the years ahead. But as the real estate industry embraces digital transformation, we must remain mindful that technology is a tool, not a substitute for expertise and the responsibility for making informed decisions must continue to rest with qualified and trained professionals who must continue to learn, unlearn and relearn as technology evolves, rather than blindly relying solely on artificial intelligence programmes.

Sulaiman Saheh is the senior director of research and consultancy services at Rahim & Co Chestertons, a global real estate agency.

Here's how to dine on durian wisely

 It’s hard to stop at just a few pieces of durian, but if you keep going, it can easily add up to another entire meal’s worth of calories. — LIM BENG TATT/The Star 

Two durian pieces fine, 15 equal to a meal, says dietitian

When durian season arrives, many Malaysians do not eat durian like fruit, they consume it like a feast.

If six apples were placed on the table, most people would not finish all six at one sitting.

The same goes for eight oranges or 10 bananas, for example.

But when it comes to durian, “just one more piece” can easily become 10, 15, or even 20 pieces (or seeds), before anyone realises it.

The issue is not that durian is “bad”. The real issue is portion size.

After 15 pieces

A recent personal observation using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) showed how much portion size can matter.

A CGM is a small sensor that tracks glucose levels throughout the day.

Before eating the durian, the glucose reading was 4.9 mmol/L.

After consuming 15 pieces of durian, the reading rose to 8.0 mmol/L within an hour.

It peaked at 9.1 mmol/L after about 90 minutes before gradually coming down over the next few hours.

If blood glucose had only been checked before eating and two hours after eating, the result may not have looked alarming.

But the CGM showed the full journey: how high the glucose climbed, how long it stayed elevated, and how much work the body had to do to bring it back down.

This was only an individual observation, not a clinical study, and glucose response can differ from person to person.

However, it is a useful reminder that blood glucose response is not only about the type of food we eat, but also about the total portion we consume.

The glucose did not rise because of one piece; every extra piece contributed to the total glucose load the body had to manage.

Each piece of durian adds more carbohydrate for the body to process.

The body then releases insulin to help move glucose from the bloodstream into the muscles and liver to be used or stored as energy.

When calorie intake repeatedly exceeds what the body needs, the excess energy may contribute to weight gain over time.

Every additional piece means more glucose to manage, more insulin to release and more calories to handle.

Durian nutrients

An average piece of durian, weighing about 27g, contains approximately 45 kcal and 8g of carbohydrate.

At the same time, durian also provides dietary fibre, potassium, vitamins B and C, and beneficial antioxidants.

In other words, durian is still a fruit that provides good nutrients.

Like every other fruit, it has a recommended serving size.

Malaysians are generally encouraged to consume two servings of fruit daily, and durian can fit into this recommendation when eaten in the right portion.

For example, one serving of fruit looks like this:

  • One medium apple
  • One small banana
  • One medium orange
  • One slice of papaya
  • Two average-sized pieces of durian.

Two average-sized pieces of durian provide about 90 kcal and 16g of carbohydrates.

This can still be considered a moderate-sized snack portion.

That is why two average-sized pieces of durian can be considered one serving of fruit.

‘Just one more piece’

The current cheaper prices of durian makes it even harder to limit consumption for durian lovers. — AZHAR MAHFOF/The Star
The current cheaper prices of durian makes it even harder to limit consumption for durian lovers. — AZHAR MAHFOF/The Star

The problem is not consuming the two pieces of durian; the problem is that durian is rarely limited to just two pieces.

Below are the amount of calories and carbohydrates for different amounts of durian:

  • One piece: 45 kcal and 8g
  • Five pieces: 225 kcal and 40g
  • 10 pieces: 450 kcal and 80g
  • 15 pieces: 675 kcal and 120g.

For comparison, a typical Malaysian lunch or dinner may provide around 500 kcal and 60g of carbohydrate, depending on food choices and portion size.

Now, imagine enjoying 10, or even 15, pieces of durian.

Without realising it, those “just one more piece” moments can quietly add another entire meal’s worth of calories and carbohydrates to your daily food intake.

Durian is generally considered a low to medium glycaemic index (GI) fruit.

Because of this, some people may assume it can be eaten freely.

ALSO READ: Understanding the glycaemic index

However, the glycaemic index of a food is only one part of the picture.

The bigger concern during durian season is glycaemic load, which refers to the total amount of carbohydrates consumed.

One or two pieces may be manageable for many people.

But 10 or 15 pieces create a much higher glucose load for the body to manage.

This is especially important for people living with diabetes, prediabetes, insulin resistance, weight concerns or a family history of diabetes.

Eat wisely

Still, Malaysians do not need to avoid durian completely.

Food should not be about fear; durian can still be enjoyed.

The key is to enjoy it with better awareness and a more mindful portion, especially when it is eaten after a full meal:

  • Keep to about two average- sized pieces as one fruit serving.
  • Avoid eating a large amount of durian immediately after a heavy rice-based meal.
  • Share with family or friends instead of finishing one box or fruit alone.
  • Eat slowly and enjoy the taste, instead of turning it into a challenge.

For people with diabetes, prediabetes or other health concerns, monitoring your blood glucose response and seeking personalised advice from a dietitian or healthcare professional can help support better food choices.

Durian season is something many Malaysians look forward to.

The goal is not to stop people from enjoying durian, but to help everyone enjoy it with better awareness.

Khoo Wei Jin is a dietitian at Alpro Pharmacy. For more information, email starhealth@thestar.com.my. The information provided is for educational and communication purposes only, and should not be considered as medical advice. The Star does not give any warranty on accuracy, completeness, functionality, usefulness or other assurances as to the content appearing in this article. The Star disclaims all responsibility for any losses, damage to property or personal injury suffered directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.

Related stories:


Two durian pieces fine, 15 equal to a meal, says dietitian